Principia Synthesia
SearchTimelineOrganizations
Sign inGet started
© 2026 Principia Synthesia
ThemePricingSupport
@principia-official/My notes to understanding Gradient Echo Memory
2 / 10

Field operators

PreviousNext

Field operators definition

From the discrete case,

∣ψ;f⟩=∑kf(k)a†(k)∣0⟩\ket{\psi;f}=\sum_k f(k) a^\dagger(k)\ket{0}∣ψ;f⟩=k∑​f(k)a†(k)∣0⟩

We can easily see what we need, which is

∣ψ;f⟩=∫dω f(ω)E†(ω)∣0⟩\ket{\psi;f}=\int \mathrm{d}\omega\, f(\omega) E^\dagger(\omega)\ket{0}∣ψ;f⟩=∫dωf(ω)E†(ω)∣0⟩

This is the definition of EEE we will take; it is the aaa operator in the continuous limit.

Properties

Since ∣ψ;f⟩\ket{\psi;f}∣ψ;f⟩ should be normalized, and assuming [E(ω),E†(ω′)][E(\omega),E^\dagger(\omega')][E(ω),E†(ω′)] is a c‑number, the normalization condition forces

[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]=δ(ω−ω′).[\hat{E}(\omega), \hat{E}^\dagger(\omega')]=\delta(\omega-\omega').[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]

From the previous chapter, we noted that

[a^k,a^k′†]=δkk′.[\hat{a}_k, \hat{a}_{k'}^\dagger]=\delta_{kk'}.[a^k​,a^k

For a field with continuous modes, the equivalent relation is

[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]=δ(ω−ω′).[\hat{E}(\omega), \hat{E}^\dagger(\omega')]=\delta(\omega-\omega').[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]

Rigor

Although the interpretation makes it obvious why the above should be true, it is worth noting more physical detail via a rigorous derivation.

Setup

We consider an one‑dimensional cavity of length LLL with periodic boundary conditions. The classical electromagnetic field in Coulomb gauge can be expanded in normal modes. Quantization promotes the Fourier amplitudes to operators.

The full free‑field Hamiltonian is

H^=12∫0Ldx(ϵ0E^2(x)+1μ0B^2(x)).\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2}\int_0^L \mathrm{d}x \left( \epsilon_0 \hat{E}^2(x) + \frac{1}{\mu_0}\hat{B}^2(x) \right).H^=21​∫

A general expansion of the electric field consistent with the wave equation and the boundary conditions is

E^(x)=i∑kEk(a^keikx−a^k†e−ikx),\hat{E}(x) = i\sum_k \mathcal{E}_k \left( \hat{a}_k e^{ikx} - \hat{a}_k^\dagger e^{-ikx} \right),E^(x)=ik∑​E

where k=2πn/Lk = 2\pi n/Lk=2πn/L with n∈Zn\in\mathbb{Z}n∈Z, and Ek\mathcal{E}_kEk​ is a real normalization constant to be determined (it may depend on ∣k∣|k|).

The iii and the negative phase on a^†\hat{a}^\daggera^† here is by convention where A^\hat{A}A^ should be ∝a^eikx+a^†e−ikx\propto \hat{a}e^{ikx} + \hat{a}^\dagger e^{-ikx} then since is the canonical variable that have the priority to be quantized.

The corresponding magnetic field for a plane‑polarized wave propagating along xxx is

B^(x)=i∑kk∣k∣Ekc(a^keikx−a^k†e−ikx),c=1ϵ0μ0.\hat{B}(x) = i\sum_k \frac{k}{|k|}\frac{\mathcal{E}_k}{c} \left( \hat{a}_k e^{ikx} - \hat{a}_k^\dagger e^{-ikx} \right), \qquad c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}.B^(x)=ik∑​

The bosonic operators satisfy [a^k,a^k′†]=δk,k′[\hat{a}_k,\hat{a}_{k'}^\dagger] = \delta_{k,k'}[a^k​,a^k, .

Equate to find Ek\mathcal{E}_kEk​

Insert the expansions into H^\hat{H}H^ and use the spatial integrals

∫0Lei(k+k′)xdx=Lδk,−k′,∫0Lei(k−k′)xdx=Lδk,k′.\int_0^L e^{i(k+k')x}\mathrm{d}x = L\delta_{k,-k'},\qquad \int_0^L e^{i(k-k')x}\mathrm{d}x = L\delta_{k,k'}.∫0L​ei(k

After straightforward algebra, the Hamiltonian becomes

H^=∑kϵ0LEk2(2a^k†a^k+1+a^ka^−k+a^k†a^−k†)−∑k1μ0c2LEk2(a^ka^−k+a^k†a^−k†),\begin{aligned} \hat{H} &= \sum_k \epsilon_0 L \mathcal{E}_k^2 \Bigl(2\hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_k + 1 + \hat{a}_k\hat{a}_{-k} + \hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_{-k}^\dagger \Bigr) \\ &\qquad - \sum_k \frac{1}{\mu_0 c^2} L \mathcal{E}_k^2 \Bigl( \hat{a}_k\hat{a}_{-k} + \hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_{-k}^\dagger \Bigr), \end{aligned}

where we used [a^k,a^k†]=1[\hat{a}_k,\hat{a}_k^\dagger]=1[a^k​,a^k†​]=1 and kept only non‑vanishing terms. Because , the coefficients in front of the non‑diagonal terms and cancel exactly. The remaining diagonal part is

H^=∑k2ϵ0LEk2(a^k†a^k+12).\hat{H} = \sum_k 2\epsilon_0 L \mathcal{E}_k^2 \left( \hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_k + \frac{1}{2} \right).H^=k∑​2ϵ0​LE

We demand that this reproduces the known harmonic‑oscillator Hamiltonian H^=∑kℏωk(a^k†a^k+1/2)\hat{H} = \sum_k \hbar\omega_k (\hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_k + 1/2)H^=∑k​ℏωk​(. Comparing the two expressions yields

2ϵ0LEk2=ℏωk⟹Ek=ℏωk2ϵ0L.2\epsilon_0 L \mathcal{E}_k^2 = \hbar\omega_k \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \mathcal{E}_k = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{2\epsilon_0 L}}.2ϵ0​LEk2​=ℏω

Thus the electric field operator is

E^(x)=i∑kℏωk2ϵ0L(a^keikx−a^k†e−ikx).\hat{E}(x) = i\sum_k \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{2\epsilon_0 L}} \left( \hat{a}_k e^{ikx} - \hat{a}_k^\dagger e^{-ikx} \right).E^(x)=ik∑​

Infinite limit

Let Δk=2πL\Delta k = \frac{2\pi}{L}Δk=L2π​. In order to make the modes continuous, we take L→∞L\to\inftyL→∞. Factor as follows:

E^(x)=i∑k2πLℏωk4πϵ0(eikxL2π a^k−e−ikxL2π a^k†)→L→∞i∫−∞∞dk ℏωk4πϵ0 E^(k)eikx+h.c.,\begin{align*} \hat{E}(x) &= i\sum_k \frac{2\pi}{L} \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{4\pi\epsilon_0}} \left( e^{ikx} \sqrt{\frac{L}{2\pi}}\,\hat{a}_k - e^{-ikx} \sqrt{\frac{L}{2\pi}}\,\hat{a}_k^\dagger \right) \\ &\xrightarrow[L\to\infty]{} i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d}k \, \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{4\pi\epsilon_0}} \, \hat{E}(k) e^{ikx} + \text{h.c.}, \end{align*}

where we defined the continuum annihilation operator

E^(k)=L2π a^k,[E^(k),E^†(k′)]=δ(k−k′).\hat{E}(k) = \sqrt{\frac{L}{2\pi}}\,\hat{a}_k, \qquad [\hat{E}(k),\hat{E}^\dagger(k')] = \delta(k-k').E^(k)=2π

E(ω)E(\omega)E(ω) operator

Because ωk=c∣k∣\omega_k = c|k|ωk​=c∣k∣, we can restrict the integration to positive frequencies. For ω>0\omega>0ω>0, set k=ω/ck = \omega/ck=ω/c (positive ) and . Then

E^(x)=i∫0∞dω ℏω4πϵ0c E^(ω)eiωx/c+h.c.,\hat{E}(x) = i\int_{0}^{\infty} \mathrm{d}\omega \, \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c}} \, \hat{E}(\omega) e^{i\omega x/c} + \text{h.c.},E^(x)=i∫0∞​

where we have absorbed the factor 1/c1/\sqrt{c}1/c​ from the integration measure into the definition of the continuous frequency operator

E^(ω)≡1cE^(k ⁣= ⁣ω/c).\hat{E}(\omega) \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{c}} \hat{E}(k\!=\!\omega/c).E^(ω)≡c​

With this definition, [E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]=δ(ω−ω′)[\hat{E}(\omega),\hat{E}^\dagger(\omega')] = \delta(\omega-\omega')[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]= because

[E^(ω),E^†(ω′)]=1c[E^(ω/c),E^†(ω′/c)]=1cδ ⁣(ω−ω′c)=δ(ω−ω′).[\hat{E}(\omega),\hat{E}^\dagger(\omega')] = \frac{1}{c} [\hat{E}(\omega/c),\hat{E}^\dagger(\omega'/c)] = \frac{1}{c} \delta\!\left(\frac{\omega-\omega'}{c}\right) = \delta(\omega-\omega').[E^(ω),

Positive‑ and negative‑frequency parts (standard decomposition)

We define the positive‑frequency part of the electric field operator as

E^(+)(x)≡i∫0∞dω ℏω4πϵ0c E^(ω)eiωx/c,\hat{E}^{(+)}(x) \equiv i\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}\omega\, \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c}}\,\hat{E}(\omega) e^{i\omega x/c},E^(+)(x)≡i∫

and the negative‑frequency part as its Hermitian conjugate:

E^(−)(x)≡[E^(+)(x)]†=−i∫0∞dω ℏω4πϵ0c E^†(ω)e−iωx/c.\hat{E}^{(-)}(x) \equiv \left[\hat{E}^{(+)}(x)\right]^\dagger = -i\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}\omega\, \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c}}\,\hat{E}^\dagger(\omega) e^{-i\omega x/c}.E^(−)(x)≡

Then the full (Hermitian) field operator is simply

E^(x)=E^(+)(x)+E^(−)(x).\hat{E}(x) = \hat{E}^{(+)}(x) + \hat{E}^{(-)}(x).E^(x)=E^(+)(x)+

This decomposition is standard in quantum optics because E^(+)(x)\hat{E}^{(+)}(x)E^(+)(x) annihilates the vacuum and E^(−)(x)\hat{E}^{(-)}(x)E^(− creates excitations.

Substitute back to the state expansion

The state ∣ψ;f⟩|\psi;f\rangle∣ψ;f⟩ transforms accordingly. Up to a re-scaling of fff,

∣ψ;f⟩=∫dk L2πf(k) E^†(k)∣0⟩=∫dk f~(k) E^†(k)∣0⟩=∫dω f(ω)E†(ω)∣0⟩.\begin{align*} \ket{\psi;f} &= \int\mathrm{d}k\,\sqrt{\frac{L}{2\pi}}f(k)\,\hat{E}^\dagger(k)\ket{0} \\ &= \int\mathrm{d}k\,\tilde{f}(k)\,\hat{E}^\dagger(k)\ket{0} \\ &= \int\mathrm{d}\omega\,f(\omega)E^\dagger(\omega)\ket{0}. \end{align*}

The commutation

From the definition E^(k)=L/(2π) a^k\hat{E}(k)=\sqrt{L/(2\pi)}\,\hat{a}_kE^(k)=L/(2π)​ and , we have

[E^(k),E^†(k′)]=L2πδkk′  →L→∞  δ(k−k′).[\hat{E}(k),\hat{E}^\dagger(k')] = \frac{L}{2\pi}\delta_{kk'} \;\xrightarrow[L\to\infty]{}\; \delta(k-k').[E^(k),E^†

In terms of frequency,

[E(ω),E†(ω′)]=δ(ω−ω′),[E(\omega),E^\dagger(\omega')] = \delta(\omega-\omega'),[E(ω),E†(ω′)]=δ(ω−ω

which matches the result obtained from normalization.

In 3D

It is anyway a phase convention, we will drop the iii from here. Then, in 3D

E^(r)=∑k,λEk(a^k,λ e^k,λ eik⋅r+a^k,λ† e^k,λ∗ e−ik⋅r)\hat{\mathbf{E}}(\mathbf{r})=\sum_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\mathcal{E}_k\left(\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}+\hat{a}^\dagger_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}^*_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}\right)E^(r)=

where

Ek=ℏωk2ϵ0V\mathcal{E}_k=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar \omega_k}{2\epsilon_0 V}}Ek​=2ϵ0​Vℏω

The sum is over all wavevectors k=2πL(nx,ny,nz)\mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L}(n_x, n_y, n_z)k=L2π​(nx​,ny​ with , and over two transverse polarizations satisfying .

Continuous limit in 3D

The discrete sum becomes an integral via the replacement

∑k⟶V(2π)3∫d3k\sum_\mathbf{k} \longrightarrow \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}\int \mathrm{d}^3kk∑​⟶(2π)3V​∫d

which follows from the fact that each mode occupies a volume (2π/L)3=(2π)3/V(2\pi/L)^3 = (2\pi)^3/V(2π/L)3=(2π)3/V in k\mathbf{k}k-space. Define the continuum operators

a^k,λ⟶V(2π)3 a^(k,λ),[a^(k,λ),a^†(k′,λ′)]=δ(3)(k−k′)δλλ′\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda} \longrightarrow \sqrt{\frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}}\,\hat{a}(\mathbf{k},\lambda), \qquad [\hat{a}(\mathbf{k},\lambda),\hat{a}^\dagger(\mathbf{k}',\lambda')] = \delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{k}')\delta_{\lambda\lambda'}a^

so that the commutation relation becomes a Dirac delta instead of a Kronecker delta. Note the same 1/V1/\sqrt{V}1/V​ cancellation as in 1D: Ek∝1/V\mathcal{E}_k \propto 1/\sqrt{V}Ek​∝ while the mode density grows as , so all physical observables are -independent.

Substituting:

E^(r)=∑λ∫d3k(2π)3ℏωk2ϵ0(a^(k,λ) e^k,λ eik⋅r+a^†(k,λ) e^k,λ∗ e−ik⋅r)\hat{\mathbf{E}}(\mathbf{r}) = \sum_\lambda \int \frac{\mathrm{d}^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega_k}{2\epsilon_0}} \left( \hat{a}(\mathbf{k},\lambda)\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} + \hat{a}^\dagger(\mathbf{k},\lambda)\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}^*_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}} \right)E^(r

Switching to spherical coordinates in k\mathbf{k}k-space with k=∣k∣k = |\mathbf{k}|k=∣k∣, ωk=ck\omega_k = ckωk​=ck, and d3k=k2 dk dΩ\mathrm{d}^3k = k^2\,\mathrm{d}k\,\mathrm{d}\Omega:

E^(r)=∑λ∫0∞dω(2π)3c3∫dΩ ω2ℏω2ϵ0(a^(ω,k^,λ) e^k^,λ eiωk^⋅r/c+h.c.)\hat{\mathbf{E}}(\mathbf{r}) = \sum_\lambda \int_0^\infty \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{(2\pi)^3 c^3} \int \mathrm{d}\Omega\, \omega^2 \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon_0}} \left( \hat{a}(\omega,\hat{k},\lambda)\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}_{\hat{k},\lambda}\,e^{i\omega\hat{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}/c} + \text{h.c.} \right)E^(r)=

For an atom at the origin (dipole approximation, eik⋅ratom≈1e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_\text{atom}} \approx 1eik⋅ratom​≈1) or when only the frequency content matters, one typically integrates out the angular and polarization degrees of freedom. This yields the spectral density of the field, which is the physically relevant quantity for decay rates and is manifestly VVV-independent.

Positive- and negative-frequency parts in 3D

As in 1D, we split

E^(r)=E^(+)(r)+E^(−)(r)\hat{\mathbf{E}}(\mathbf{r}) = \hat{\mathbf{E}}^{(+)}(\mathbf{r}) + \hat{\mathbf{E}}^{(-)}(\mathbf{r})E^(r)=E^(+)(r)+

where

E^(+)(r)=∑k,λEk a^k,λ e^k,λ eik⋅r\hat{\mathbf{E}}^{(+)}(\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{\mathbf{k},\lambda} \mathcal{E}_k\, \hat{a}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,\hat{\mathbf{e}}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda}\,e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}E^(+)(r)=k

contains only annihilation operators (positive frequency, annihilates vacuum), and E^(−)=[E^(+)]†\hat{\mathbf{E}}^{(-)} = \left[\hat{\mathbf{E}}^{(+)}\right]^\daggerE^(−)=[E^(+)] contains only creation operators. This decomposition is used throughout quantum optics: photodetection theory, the optical Bloch equations, and the input-output formalism all rely on it.

=
δ(ω−
ω′).
′
†
​
]
=
δkk′​.
=
δ(ω−
ω′).
0
L
​
d
x
(ϵ0​E^2(x)+μ0​1​B^2(x))
.
k
​
(a^k​eikx−a^k†​e−ikx)
,
∣
k
∣
∝
a^eikx+
a^†e−ikx
E^=−∂tA^\hat{E}=-\partial_t \hat{A}E^=−∂t​A^
A^\hat{A}A^
∣k∣k​
cEk​​
(a^k​eikx−a^k†​e−ikx)
,
c
=
ϵ0​μ0​​1​.
′
†
​
]
=
δk,k′​
[a^k,a^k′]=0[\hat{a}_k,\hat{a}_{k'}]=0[a^k​,a^k′​]=0
+
k′
)
x
d
x
=
Lδk,−k′​,∫0L​ei(k−k′)xdx=
Lδk,k′​.
H^​=k∑​ϵ0​LEk2​(2a^k†​a^k​+1+a^k​a^−k​+a^k†​a^−k†​)−k∑​μ0​c21​LEk​

ϵ0μ0c2=1\epsilon_0\mu_0 c^2 = 1ϵ0​μ0​c2=1
a^ka^−k\hat{a}_k\hat{a}_{-k}a^k​a^−k​
a^k†a^−k†\hat{a}_k^\dagger\hat{a}_{-k}^\daggera^k†​a^−k†​
k2​
(a^k†​a^k​+21​)
.
a
^
k†​
a^k​
+
1/2)
k
​
⟹
Ek​=
2ϵ0​Lℏωk​​​.
2ϵ0​Lℏωk​​
​
(a^k​eikx−a^k†​e−ikx)
.
E^(x)​=ik∑​L2π​4πϵ0​ℏωk​​​(eikx2πL​​a^L→∞​i∫−∞∞​dk​
L
​
​
a^k​
,
[
E^
(
k
)
,
E^†
(
k′
)]
=
δ(k−
k′).
kk
k
dk=dω/c\mathrm{d}k = \mathrm{d}\omega/cdk=dω/c
d
ω
4πϵ0​cℏω​​
E^
(
ω
)
eiωx/c
+
h.c.,
1
​
E^
(
k
=
ω/c).
δ(ω−
ω′)
E
^
†
(
ω′
)]
=
c1​[E^(ω/c),E^†(ω′/c)]=
c1​δ(cω−ω′​)=
δ(ω−
ω′).
0
∞
​
d
ω
4πϵ0​cℏω​​
E^
(
ω
)
eiωx/c
,
[E^(+)(x)]†
=
−i∫0∞​dω4πϵ0​cℏω​​E^†(ω)e−iωx/c.
E^
(−)
(
x
)
.
)
(
x
)
∣ψ;f⟩
​
=∫dk2πL​​f(k)E^†(k)∣0⟩=∫dkf~​(k)E^†(k)∣0⟩=∫dωf(ω)E†(ω)∣0⟩.​
a^
k​
[a^k,a^k′†]=δkk′[\hat{a}_k,\hat{a}_{k'}^\dagger]=\delta_{kk'}[a^k​,a^k′†​]=δkk′​
(
k′
)]
=
2πL​δkk′​L→∞​
δ(k−
k′).
′
)
,
k,λ
∑
​
Ek​
(a^k,λ​e^k,λ​eik⋅r+a^k,λ†​e^k,λ∗​e−ik⋅r)
k​
​
​
,
nz​
)
ni∈Zn_i \in \mathbb{Z}ni​∈Z
λ=1,2\lambda = 1,2λ=1,2
e^k,λ⊥k\hat{\mathbf{e}}_{\mathbf{k},\lambda} \perp \mathbf{k}e^k,λ​⊥k
3
k
k
,
λ
​
⟶
(2π)3V​​a^(k,λ),[a^(k,λ),a^†(k′,λ′)]=
δ(3)(k−
k′)δλλ′​
1/
V​
VVV
VVV
)
=
λ∑​∫(2π)3d3k​2ϵ0​ℏωk​​​(a^(k,λ)e^k,λ​eik⋅r+a^
d3k=k2dkdΩ
λ∑​
∫0∞​
(2π)3c3dω​
∫
d
Ω
ω2
2ϵ0​ℏω​​
(a^(ω,k^,λ)e^k^,λ​eiωk^⋅r/c+h.c.)
E^
(−)
(
r
)
,
λ
∑
​
Ek​
a^k,λ​
e^k,λ​
eik⋅r
†
2
​
(
a^k​
a^−k​
+
a^k†​
a^−k†​
)
,
k​
−
e−ikx
2πL​​
a^k†​
)
4πϵ0​ℏωk​​
​
E^
(
k
)
eikx
+
h.c.
,
†
(
k
,
λ
)
e^k,λ∗​
e−ik⋅r
)