Jaynes-Cummings model§
If we even drop the ∣ g ∣ 2 |g|^2 ∣ g ∣ 2 terms from the previous expansion, this is the Jaynes-Cummings model. And since this model conserve energy ( energy don't fluctuate ), we take
{ A ^ = b ^ σ ^ + A ^ † = b ^ † σ ^ − \begin{cases}
\hat{A} = \hat{b}\hat{\sigma}^+ \\
\hat{A}^\dagger = \hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^- \\
\end{cases} { A ^ = b ^ σ ^ + A ^ † = b ^ † σ ^ −
H ^ JC = ℏ ω e g σ ^ e + ℏ ω n ^ + ℏ g A ^ + ℏ g ∗ A ^ † \hat{H}_\text{JC}=\hbar\omega_{eg}\hat{\sigma}_e+\hbar\omega\hat{n} + \hbar g\hat{A}+\hbar g^*\hat{A}^\dagger H ^ JC = ℏ ω e g σ ^ e + ℏ ω n ^ + ℏ g A ^ + ℏ g ∗ A ^ †
Notice that at some point we also have droped the summation over k k k and λ \lambda λ which is justified as resonant interaction is dominant.
Conservation§
Since this models only contain energy converating terms ( a raise on atomic level must lower the cavity photon count, or vis versa ). We expect the new number operator to be conserved. We call this the excitation number
N ^ = n ^ + σ ^ e \hat{N}=\hat{n}+\hat{\sigma}_e N ^ = n ^ + σ ^ e
We want
[ H ^ JC , N ^ ] = 0 [\hat{H}_\text{JC}, \hat{N}] = 0 [ H ^ JC , N ^ ] = 0
Verify term by term§
[ σ ^ e , N ^ ] = [ σ ^ e , b † b ^ ] + [ σ ^ e , σ ^ e ] = 0 [\hat{\sigma}_e,\hat{N}]=[\hat{\sigma}_e,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{\sigma}_e,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [ σ ^ e , N ^ ] = [ σ ^ e , b † b ^ ] + [ σ ^ e , σ ^ e ] = 0
[ b † b ^ , N ^ ] = [ b † b ^ , b † b ^ ] + [ b † b ^ , σ ^ e ] = 0 [{b}^\dagger\hat{b},\hat{N}]=[{b}^\dagger\hat{b},{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[{b}^\dagger\hat{b},\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [ b † b ^ , N ^ ] = [ b † b ^ , b † b ^ ] + [ b † b ^ , σ ^ e ] = 0
[ b ^ σ + , N ^ ] = [ b ^ σ + , b † b ^ ] + [ b ^ σ + , σ ^ e ] = 0 [\hat{b}\sigma^+,\hat{N}]=[\hat{b}\sigma^+,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{b}\sigma^+,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [ b ^ σ + , N ^ ] = [ b ^ σ + , b † b ^ ] + [ b ^ σ + , σ ^ e ] = 0
[ b ^ † σ ^ − , N ^ ] = [ b ^ † σ ^ − , b † b ^ ] + [ b ^ † σ ^ − , σ ^ e ] = 0 [\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,\hat{N}]=[\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [ b ^ † σ ^ − , N ^ ] = [ b ^ † σ ^ − , b † b ^ ] + [ b ^ † σ ^ − , σ ^ e ] = 0
So indeed N ^ \hat{N} N ^ is a conserved quantity
Choosing basis§
Because N ^ \hat{N} N ^ is converved, we can build basis out of it, let's take
∣ 0 ⟩ = ∣ g , n ⟩ ∣ 1 ⟩ = ∣ e , n − 1 ⟩ \ket{0}=\ket{g,n} \qquad \ket{1}=\ket{e,n-1} ∣ 0 ⟩ = ∣ g , n ⟩ ∣ 1 ⟩ = ∣ e , n − 1 ⟩
Any arbitrary state will be ∣ ψ ⟩ = c g ∣ 0 ⟩ + c e ∣ 1 ⟩ \ket{\psi}=c_g\ket{0}+c_e\ket{1} ∣ ψ ⟩ = c g ∣ 0 ⟩ + c e ∣ 1 ⟩
Rabi frequncy§
Where it is not obvious for now, but let's call The Rabi frequency at resonant
Ω R = 2 ∣ g ∣ n \Omega_R = 2|g|\sqrt{n} Ω R = 2∣ g ∣ n
With the general Rabi frequency, or, just Rabi frequency
Ω = Δ 2 + Ω R 2 \Omega=\sqrt{\Delta^2 + \Omega_R^2} Ω = Δ 2 + Ω R 2
The matrix§
In order to calculate the Hamiltonian matrix, we evaluate
{ H ^ JC ∣ 0 ⟩ = ℏ ω n ∣ 0 ⟩ + ℏ g n ∣ 1 ⟩ H ^ JC ∣ 1 ⟩ = ℏ ( ω e g + ω ( n − 1 ) ) ∣ 1 ⟩ + ℏ g ∗ n ∣ 0 ⟩ \begin{cases}
\hat{H}_\text{JC}\ket{0}=\hbar\omega n\ket{0} + \hbar g\sqrt{n}\ket{1} \\
\hat{H}_\text{JC}\ket{1}=\hbar(\omega_{eg} + \omega(n-1))\ket{1} + \hbar g^*\sqrt{n}\ket{0} \\
\end{cases} { H ^ JC ∣ 0 ⟩ = ℏ ω n ∣ 0 ⟩ + ℏ g n ∣ 1 ⟩ H ^ JC ∣ 1 ⟩ = ℏ ( ω e g + ω ( n − 1 )) ∣ 1 ⟩ + ℏ g ∗ n ∣ 0 ⟩
Thus
H JC = ℏ [ n ω g ∗ n g n Δ + n ω ] H_\text{JC}= \hbar
\begin{bmatrix}
n\omega & g^*\sqrt{n} \\
g\sqrt{n} & \Delta + n\omega
\end{bmatrix} H JC = ℏ [ nω g n g ∗ n Δ + nω ]
Simplify§
Note that by adding something propotional to the Identity, we are just shifting the base energy of the system and introducing a global frequency to all state and those will not affect the physical measurement.
Let's subtract the avarage energy from the system to create symmetry.
E avg = ℏ ( ω n + Δ 2 ) E_\text{avg} = \hbar\left(\omega n + \frac{\Delta}{2}\right) E avg = ℏ ( ω n + 2 Δ )
H JC = ℏ [ − Δ / 2 g ∗ n g n Δ / 2 ] H_\text{JC}= \hbar
\begin{bmatrix}
-\Delta/2 & g^*\sqrt{n} \\
g\sqrt{n} & \Delta/2
\end{bmatrix} H JC = ℏ [ − Δ/2 g n g ∗ n Δ/2 ]
Eigenstates§
We are able find it's eigenenergy trivially given its symettry, but a standard trick that makes the notation much cleaner for the eigenstates later on is
Parametrize into mixing angle§
Let
tan 2 θ = 2 ∣ g ∣ n Δ = Ω R Δ \tan2\theta=\frac{2|g|\sqrt{n}}{\Delta}=\frac{\Omega_R}{\Delta} tan 2 θ = Δ 2∣ g ∣ n = Δ Ω R
Thus,
{ Ω sin 2 θ = Ω R Ω cos 2 θ = Δ \begin{cases}
\Omega\sin2\theta=\Omega_R \\
\Omega\cos2\theta= \Delta \\
\end{cases} { Ω sin 2 θ = Ω R Ω cos 2 θ = Δ
Where
Ω 2 = Δ 2 + Ω R 2 \Omega^2=\Delta^2 + \Omega_R^2 Ω 2 = Δ 2 + Ω R 2
Now we rewrite the hamiltonian matrix as
H JC = Ω 2 ℏ [ − cos 2 θ e − i ϕ sin 2 θ e i ϕ sin 2 θ cos 2 θ ] H_\text{JC}= \frac{\Omega}{2}\hbar
\begin{bmatrix}
-\cos2\theta & e^{-i\phi}\sin2\theta \\
e^{i\phi}\sin2\theta & \cos2\theta
\end{bmatrix} H JC = 2 Ω ℏ [ − cos 2 θ e i ϕ sin 2 θ e − i ϕ sin 2 θ cos 2 θ ]
Which easily we see
E = ± ℏ Ω 2 E=\pm\hbar \frac{\Omega}{2} E = ± ℏ 2 Ω
And to rewind back before we shifted the energy
E = ℏ ( n ω + Δ 2 ± Ω 2 ) E=\hbar\left(n\omega+\frac{\Delta}{2}\pm \frac{\Omega}{2} \right) E = ℏ ( nω + 2 Δ ± 2 Ω )
And for eigenstates, it is
{ ∣ n , + ⟩ = sin θ ∣ 0 ⟩ + e i ϕ cos θ ∣ 1 ⟩ ∣ n , − ⟩ = cos θ ∣ 0 ⟩ − e i ϕ sin θ ∣ 1 ⟩ \begin{cases}
\ket{n, +}=\sin\theta\ket{0}+e^{i\phi}\cos\theta\ket{1} \\
\ket{n, -}=\cos\theta\ket{0}-e^{i\phi}\sin\theta\ket{1} \\
\end{cases} { ∣ n , + ⟩ = sin θ ∣ 0 ⟩ + e i ϕ cos θ ∣ 1 ⟩ ∣ n , − ⟩ = cos θ ∣ 0 ⟩ − e i ϕ sin θ ∣ 1 ⟩
This have another more specific name called dressed states.