Jaynes-Cummings model

Sections9
  1. Jaynes-Cummings model
  2. Conservation
  3. Verify term by term
  4. Choosing basis
  5. Rabi frequncy
  6. The matrix
  7. Simplify
  8. Eigenstates
  9. Parametrize into mixing angle

Jaynes-Cummings model§

If we even drop the ∣g∣2|g|^2 terms from the previous expansion, this is the Jaynes-Cummings model. And since this model conserve energy ( energy don't fluctuate ), we take

{A^=b^σ^+A^†=b^†σ^−\begin{cases} \hat{A} = \hat{b}\hat{\sigma}^+ \\ \hat{A}^\dagger = \hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^- \\ \end{cases} H^JC=ℏωegσ^e+ℏωn^+ℏgA^+ℏg∗A^†\hat{H}_\text{JC}=\hbar\omega_{eg}\hat{\sigma}_e+\hbar\omega\hat{n} + \hbar g\hat{A}+\hbar g^*\hat{A}^\dagger

Notice that at some point we also have droped the summation over kk and λ\lambda which is justified as resonant interaction is dominant.

Conservation§

Since this models only contain energy converating terms ( a raise on atomic level must lower the cavity photon count, or vis versa ). We expect the new number operator to be conserved. We call this the excitation number

N^=n^+σ^e\hat{N}=\hat{n}+\hat{\sigma}_e

We want

[H^JC,N^]=0[\hat{H}_\text{JC}, \hat{N}] = 0

Verify term by term§

[σ^e,N^]=[σ^e,b†b^]+[σ^e,σ^e]=0[\hat{\sigma}_e,\hat{N}]=[\hat{\sigma}_e,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{\sigma}_e,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [b†b^,N^]=[b†b^,b†b^]+[b†b^,σ^e]=0[{b}^\dagger\hat{b},\hat{N}]=[{b}^\dagger\hat{b},{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[{b}^\dagger\hat{b},\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [b^σ+,N^]=[b^σ+,b†b^]+[b^σ+,σ^e]=0[\hat{b}\sigma^+,\hat{N}]=[\hat{b}\sigma^+,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{b}\sigma^+,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0 [b^†σ^−,N^]=[b^†σ^−,b†b^]+[b^†σ^−,σ^e]=0[\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,\hat{N}]=[\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,{b}^\dagger\hat{b}]+[\hat{b}^\dagger\hat{\sigma}^-,\hat{\sigma}_e]=0

So indeed N^\hat{N} is a conserved quantity

Choosing basis§

Because N^\hat{N} is converved, we can build basis out of it, let's take

∣0⟩=∣g,n⟩∣1⟩=∣e,n−1⟩\ket{0}=\ket{g,n} \qquad \ket{1}=\ket{e,n-1}

Any arbitrary state will be ∣ψ⟩=cg∣0⟩+ce∣1⟩\ket{\psi}=c_g\ket{0}+c_e\ket{1}

Rabi frequncy§

Where it is not obvious for now, but let's call The Rabi frequency at resonant

ΩR=2∣g∣n\Omega_R = 2|g|\sqrt{n}

With the general Rabi frequency, or, just Rabi frequency

Ω=Δ2+ΩR2\Omega=\sqrt{\Delta^2 + \Omega_R^2}

The matrix§

In order to calculate the Hamiltonian matrix, we evaluate

{H^JC∣0⟩=ℏωn∣0⟩+ℏgn∣1⟩H^JC∣1⟩=ℏ(ωeg+ω(n−1))∣1⟩+ℏg∗n∣0⟩\begin{cases} \hat{H}_\text{JC}\ket{0}=\hbar\omega n\ket{0} + \hbar g\sqrt{n}\ket{1} \\ \hat{H}_\text{JC}\ket{1}=\hbar(\omega_{eg} + \omega(n-1))\ket{1} + \hbar g^*\sqrt{n}\ket{0} \\ \end{cases}

Thus

HJC=ℏ[nωg∗ngnΔ+nω]H_\text{JC}= \hbar \begin{bmatrix} n\omega & g^*\sqrt{n} \\ g\sqrt{n} & \Delta + n\omega \end{bmatrix}

Simplify§

Note that by adding something propotional to the Identity, we are just shifting the base energy of the system and introducing a global frequency to all state and those will not affect the physical measurement.

Let's subtract the avarage energy from the system to create symmetry.

Eavg=ℏ(ωn+Δ2)E_\text{avg} = \hbar\left(\omega n + \frac{\Delta}{2}\right) HJC=ℏ[−Δ/2g∗ngnΔ/2]H_\text{JC}= \hbar \begin{bmatrix} -\Delta/2 & g^*\sqrt{n} \\ g\sqrt{n} & \Delta/2 \end{bmatrix}

Eigenstates§

We are able find it's eigenenergy trivially given its symettry, but a standard trick that makes the notation much cleaner for the eigenstates later on is

Parametrize into mixing angle§

Let

tan⁡2θ=2∣g∣nΔ=ΩRΔ\tan2\theta=\frac{2|g|\sqrt{n}}{\Delta}=\frac{\Omega_R}{\Delta}

Thus,

{Ωsin⁡2θ=ΩRΩcos⁡2θ=Δ\begin{cases} \Omega\sin2\theta=\Omega_R \\ \Omega\cos2\theta= \Delta \\ \end{cases}

Where

Ω2=Δ2+ΩR2\Omega^2=\Delta^2 + \Omega_R^2

Now we rewrite the hamiltonian matrix as

HJC=Ω2ℏ[−cos⁡2θe−iϕsin⁡2θeiϕsin⁡2θcos⁡2θ]H_\text{JC}= \frac{\Omega}{2}\hbar \begin{bmatrix} -\cos2\theta & e^{-i\phi}\sin2\theta \\ e^{i\phi}\sin2\theta & \cos2\theta \end{bmatrix}

Which easily we see

E=±ℏΩ2E=\pm\hbar \frac{\Omega}{2}

And to rewind back before we shifted the energy

E=ℏ(nω+Δ2±Ω2)E=\hbar\left(n\omega+\frac{\Delta}{2}\pm \frac{\Omega}{2} \right)

And for eigenstates, it is

{∣n,+⟩=sin⁡θ∣0⟩+eiϕcos⁡θ∣1⟩∣n,−⟩=cos⁡θ∣0⟩−eiϕsin⁡θ∣1⟩\begin{cases} \ket{n, +}=\sin\theta\ket{0}+e^{i\phi}\cos\theta\ket{1} \\ \ket{n, -}=\cos\theta\ket{0}-e^{i\phi}\sin\theta\ket{1} \\ \end{cases}

This have another more specific name called dressed states.

Discussion

no comments
Commenting as a guest — sign in to comment as yourself.

No comments yet — yours could open the discussion.